blog.riflegear.com

Blogging randomly from the hip.
RifleGear.com Online Store
posts - 12, comments - 527, trackbacks - 0

The Hypocrisy of Sylvester Stallone

Rambo's Guns

hypocrisy
1.  The claim, pretense, or false representation of holding beliefs, feelings, or virtues that one does not actually possess.

hypocrite
1.  Someone that practices hypocrisy.

In early June of 2007,  Los Angeles County Sheriff Lee Baca was making headlines in the news because of his role in the sensational "Paris Hilton goes to jail" story that was all over the media.  This incident started a flurry of allegations that Sheriff Baca gave special and preferential treatment to the stars and celebrities of Los Angeles County.  In one article that was published on the web, it was alleged that Sheriff Baca had issued concealed carry weapons permits (CCW) to Hollywood stars such as Sylvester Stallone and Ben Affleck.


The rumor that Sylvester Stallone was issued a CCW permit struck my interest as I had recently been made aware that he had attended a Los Angeles event sponsored by the Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence.  The "Brady Bunch", as they are commonly referred to by gun-rights advocates, are one of the most well known organizations that are lobbying to take away our rights as lawful gun owners.  I was also learning that Stallone had been quoted in the past saying some very anti-gun statements, even advocating door to door gun confiscations!  I found all of this terribly hypocritical.

 "Look at what's happening in America's inner-cities.  If our hopeless legal system continues going the same liberal direction, there will be anarchy before long.  We need one person in an influential position to stand up and tell the truth about gun control lobbies, the death penalty and that our criminal justice system basically stinks."
Sylvester Stallone, interview in Cinefantastique magazine, June 1995

"until America, door to door, takes every handgun, this is what you're gonna have... It really is pathetic... We're livin' in the Dark Ages over there."
Sylvester Stallone, March 28, 1998

 "I know we use guns in films," but insisted the time has come "to be a little more accountable and realize that this is an escalating problem that’s eventually going to lead to, I think, urban warfare."
Sylvester Stallone on Access Hollywood, June 8, 1998

"It [2nd Amendment] has to be stopped, and someone really has to go on the line, a certain dauntless political figure, and say, ‘It’s ending, it’s over, all bets are off. It’s not 200 years ago, we don’t need this anymore, and the rest of the world doesn’t have it. Why should we?"
Sylvester Stallone on Access Hollywood, June 8, 1998

sources: hereherehere, and here

 

Stallone at the Brady Center sponsored "Stand Up for a Safe America" event in Los Angeles, CA on Sunday, November 22nd.

 

Note that Bernie Mac is also guilty of hypocricy when it comes to gun rights:

“I have Glocks, .45s, Berettas, over-unders, Remingtons. I like the marksmanship and the discipline that it takes to be a gun owner. I like the machinery, breaking it down. Being able to take it out, clean it and put the spring back in is even more fascinating than having the gun.”
Bernie Mac in Playboy interview, December 2004

 

How can someone that has made millions of dollars in films that glorify gun violence and killing, movies such as First Blood, Rambo, Cobra, and Judge Dredd just to name a few, be so hypocritical on the issue of the Second Amendment and gun ownership rights.  Can someone that is so clearly supporting the Brady Bunch and has called for door-to-door gun confiscations actually own guns himself and have a CCW permit?  Not to mention the special treatment he would have received in order to get a CCW permit in a county where it is nearly impossible to get one.  I was encouraged by members of my gun forum community to try to obtain a copy of Stallone's CCW application through the California Public Records Act.  With help on how to word the request to obtain a copy of Stallones CCW application I sent my first letter to Sheriff Leroy D. Baca of the Los Angeles Sheriff's Department.  As advised, I sent this letter via certified mail so that I could track when the letter was received at their office and also so they could not deny having received the letter. 

Letter 1:


Monday, June 11, 2007
 
 
Leroy D. Baca, Sheriff
Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department
4700 Ramona Blvd.
Monterey Park, CA 91754
 
VIA CERTIFIED MAIL
 
Dear Sir:
 
The purpose of this letter is to make a request to your department for information pursuant to the California Public Records Act (PRA), GOVT. CODE §§ 6250 - 6276.48. According to the PRA, records of county government entities, including sheriffs' departments, are generally public records. According to the CBS v Block ruling (see attached), Concealed Carry of Weapons (CCW) application, issuance and renewal records are public records for the purposes of §§ 6250 - 6276.48.
 
According to recent media reports, one Sylvester Stallone, a resident of Los Angeles County, has a CCW issued by your office. I am writing to request the Concealed Carry of a Weapon (CCW) application record for Mr. Stallone. Please include pages 3 through 13 (inclusive) of the application.
 
Information to be made available includes "any writing, picture, sound, or symbol, whether paper,…, magnetic or other media." (§ 6252(e)) Please also include a color copy of the photograph from Mr. Stallone's CCW application.
 
Finally, please include copies of any letters, such as approval letters or renewal letters, which related to Mr. Stallone's CCW application, either from your office to Mr. Stallone, or received by your office from Mr. Stallone.
 
According to the Public Records Act, your office may charge statutory duplication fees for these records, usually in the range of $0.10 to $0.25 per page. I expect that the number of pages of records involved will be small, so duplication fees in this matter will be small. Please send me a bill along with the records and I will pay promptly.
 
The Public Records Act requires you to respond within ten days, and I do not expect any delays.
 
Please address all responses to me by mail at my address above.
 
Thank you for your assistance.
 

 

Response 1: 

In their first response, written by Undersheriff Larry L. Waldie,  the Sheriff's Department tried to give me an evasive answer.  Rather than providing me with a copy of the CCW application which I clearly requested they merely replied that "for your information, Mr. Stallone does not have a concealed weapons license".  Well ok, that may be true but I didn't ask if he currently has a CCW license, I asked for a copy of his application.  I wasn't going to give up so easily.  With the advice of others, I decided to write another letter of request - this time just to get acknowledgement of whether he has ever applied for a CCW permit and, if so, on what dates.

Letter 2:


Monday, June 25, 2007
 
 
Lieutenant James Hellmold
Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department
4700 Ramona Blvd.
Monterey Park, CA 91754
 
VIA CERTIFIED MAIL
 
Dear Sir:
 
Thank you for your response to my letter of June 11, 2007.   I am now requesting the following information:
 
Please inform me as to whether a Mr. Sylvester Stallone has applied for a CCW, or a CCW renewal, from your department within the past five years. If so, please inform me of the dates of application. If he applied for a renewal, please inform me as to the date of issuance of his initial permit.
 
The purpose of this letter is to make a request to your department for information pursuant to the California Public Records Act (PRA), GOVT. CODE §§ 6250 - 6276.48. According to the PRA, records of county government entities, including sheriffs' departments, are generally public records. According to the CBS v Block ruling (see attached), Concealed Carry of Weapons (CCW) application, issuance and renewal records are public records for the purposes of §§ 6250 - 6276.48.
 
According to the Public Records Act, your office may charge statutory duplication fees for these records, usually in the range of $0.10 to $0.25 per page. I expect that the number of pages of records involved will be small, so duplication fees in this matter will be small. Please send me a bill along with the records and I will pay promptly.
 
The Public Records Act requires you to respond within ten days, and I do not expect any delays. Please address all responses to me by mail at my address above.
 
Thank you for your assistance.
 

 

Response 2: 

Ah, now we are getting somewhere.  This letter didn't come from the Sherrif's office, but from the Office of the County Counsel.  I guess they decided they need to let the county lawyers handle this request since I didn't go away after their initial brush-off response.  In this letter they do confirm that Stallone has indeed applied for a CCW permit within the last five years but they need an additional 14 days in order to provide me with the actual dates.  So I wait...

 

Response 3: 

Sure enough, about two weeks later I receive another letter from the Office of the County Counsel and it has the confirmation I was looking for!

"The Sheriff's Department indicates that Mr. Stallone applied for a CCW permit on September 29, 2004.  He was issued a permit on November 30, 2004."

Armed with confirmation that he had indeed applied for and been granted a CCW permit in Los Angeles County, I wrote another letter asking specifically for a copy of Stallone's CCW application that was submitted to them on September 29, 2004.

 

Letter 3:


Wednesday, August 01, 2007
 
 
Raymond G. Fortner, Jr.
County Counsel
648 Kenneth Hahn Hall of Administration
500 West Temple Street
Los Angeles, CA 90012
 
VIA CERTIFIED MAIL
 
Dear Mr. Fortner:
 
Thank you for your response to my letter of June 25, 2007 in which I requested information on whether or not Mr. Sylvester Stallone had applied for a CCW permit and the date of the application. Now that I have confirmation that Mr. Stallone did indeed apply for a CCW permit on September 29, 2004 and that a permit was issued on November 30, 2004, I wish to again repeat my original request for a copy of Mr. Sylvester Stallone’s CCW application which was submitted on September 29, 2004.
 
Please include pages 3 through 13 (inclusive) of the application. Please also include a copy of the photograph from Mr. Stallone's CCW application.
 
Finally, please include copies of any letters, such as approval letters or renewal letters, which related to Mr. Stallone's CCW application, either from your office to Mr. Stallone, or received by your office from Mr. Stallone.
 
According to the Public Records Act, your office may charge statutory duplication fees for these records, usually in the range of $0.10 to $0.25 per page. I expect that the number of pages of records involved will be small, so duplication fees in this matter will be small. Please send me a bill along with the records and I will pay promptly.
 
The Public Records Act requires you to respond within ten days, and I do not expect any delays.
 
Please address all responses to me by mail at my address above. Thank you for your assistance.
 

 

Response 4: 

On August 24, 2007 I receive a large envelope in the mail from the Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department.  Inside of it is a copy of Sylvester Stallone's CCW application - well, some of it at least.  All of his personal information such as SSN, address, and phone numbers have been redacted but also is his entire good cause statement!  On page 14 of the application Stallone signed a statement found on all CCW applications that states "Notwithstanding any other provision of law and pursuant to the Public Records Act (Government Code section 6250 et seq.), I understand that information contained in this application may be a matter of public record and shall be made available upon request or court order."  I guess that doesn't apply to the rich and famous Hollywood-elite crowd.  Below you will find scans of all the relevant pages of Stallones CCW application.  I only include pages where Stallone actually supplies information and didn't bother with the pages that just contain text of the penal code and other information. 

 

Sylvester Stallone's CCW Application

 

Print | posted on Saturday, August 25, 2007 2:35 PM |

Feedback

Gravatar

# re: The Hypocrisy of Sylvester Stallone

Someone should request this info on Diane Feinstein next.

Would be interesting to see her application since she is the largest hypocrite around regarding 2nd amendment rights.
8/25/2007 7:56 PM | Tim
Gravatar

# re: The Hypocrisy of Sylvester Stallone

It would be interesting to see the Culver City appliction as well.
8/26/2007 9:26 AM | p. ratner
Gravatar

# re: The Hypocrisy of Sylvester Stallone

Its too bad they removed the text of page 13... what a hypocrite man...
8/26/2007 10:19 AM | Jose
Gravatar

# re: The Hypocrisy of Sylvester Stallone

Suggest you continue your efforts to obtain his Good Cause statement. Per CBS v Block, it, or portions thereof may only be withheld if they contain information specific as to time or location where the threat may arise as to compromise the safety of the applicant. I have been doing this type of PRA for over 20 years and have only been denied GC statement once. If you feel confident that the reason for withholding it is not protected you should pursue a Writ of Mandamus. This would allow a Superior Court Judge to evaluate their claim that that it is exempt from the PRA. If you are correct you will be awarded attorney fees and costs. I have intimate information on the issuance protocol of Lee Baca and I can pretty much assure you a judge will give you the GC statement and a Warrant drawn on Los Angeles County taxpayer funds for your trouble. Need more info? You have my e-mail.

"When policemen break the law, then there isn't any law. Just a fight for survival!"

Billy Jack
8/26/2007 10:24 AM | Billy Jack
Gravatar

# re: The Hypocrisy of Sylvester Stallone

Someone should also tell the genius that copyright isn't spelled with a "w." He put that down under the question of whether he was party to a lawsuit. What a moron.
8/26/2007 11:00 AM | zoo
Gravatar

# re: The Hypocrisy of Sylvester Stallone

I find it interesting that they didn't redact the serial numbers.
8/26/2007 1:47 PM | rdw
Gravatar

# re: The Hypocrisy of Sylvester Stallone

Good work getting this info & writing it up to share with us! To quote an excellent movie, "It seems my[his] hypocrisy knows no bounds." While I am all for our 2A rights as law abiding gun owners, I can understand the uninformed view of some antis and they do have a right to that view... but to see a gun owner & CCW holder publicly make anti-gun statements is ridiculous.
8/27/2007 12:19 AM | Slick_711
Gravatar

# re: The Hypocrisy of Sylvester Stallone

[44] Furthermore, there is a clear and legislatively articulated justification for disclosure -- the right of the public and the press to review the government's conduct of its business. Public inspection of the names of license holders and the reasons the licenses were requested enables the press and the public to ensure that public officials are acting properly in issuing licenses for legitimate reasons. Defendants' conclusion that White v. Davis precluded disclosure would obliterate the fundamental right of the press and the people to have access to "information concerning the conduct of the people's business." (§ 6250.)


[45] It is possible, of course, that certain information supplied by individual applicants may under certain circumstances entail a substantial privacy interest. For example, the records may contain intimate information concerning an applicant's own or his family's medical or psychological history. In such special cases, the confidential information may be deleted.

CBS Inc. v. Block, 42 Cal. 3d 646, 725 P.2d 470, 230 Cal. Rptr. 362 (Cal. 10/09/1986)
8/27/2007 9:25 AM | TBJ
Gravatar

# re: The Hypocrisy of Sylvester Stallone

Permission to link to this from my blog?
8/27/2007 1:03 PM | Bruce
Gravatar

# re: The Hypocrisy of Sylvester Stallone

Thanks for all the positive feedback on my blog entry. I grant permission for anyone to link to this blog.

I had a problem with my email settings and I see that there were several failed attempts to send me email comments since I posted the entry. That problem is fixed now so feel free to retry the email contact if you wish.

Regards,
David
8/27/2007 2:33 PM | David
Gravatar

# re: The Hypocrisy of Sylvester Stallone

Anyone else notice the spelling error in the application itself? Page 04, question 5. Read carerully ;).
8/27/2007 4:23 PM | That Guy
Gravatar

# re: The Hypocrisy of Sylvester Stallone

Anyone else notice he didn't put his county of birth like the app asks for? It should have been returned as incomplete!
8/27/2007 5:28 PM | PHX
Gravatar

# re: The Hypocrisy of Sylvester Stallone

I take it you never got the photo you asked for?
8/27/2007 7:33 PM | No photo?
Gravatar

# re: The Hypocrisy of Sylvester Stallone

In his first movie, Woody Allen's "Bananas", Stallone had a non-speaking role as a thug, a mugger. I guess that's what he really is; someone who pursues his own benefit while trashing other people's rights.
8/28/2007 5:06 AM | Frank Silbermann
Gravatar

# re: The Hypocrisy of Sylvester Stallone

Geeze, he even LIED on the application and was given the license?

Section 7 Question #2 asks about being ever in a mental institution.

Sly was a student in a school run by the Devereux Foundation. http://www.devereux.org

Their "about us" states "Devereux provides services to individuals of all ages who have emotional, developmental, and behavioral needs."

Their mission statement is:

The Devereux mission is to change lives and nurture human potential. We inspire hope, ensure well-being, and promote meaningful life choices. Our mission is achieved through a wide range of services and supports for individuals and their families.

Maybe I'm not getting the term "mental institution" right, but a special school for kids with emotional and behavioral issues sure sounds like one to me.

8/28/2007 8:36 AM | Citizen Kane
Gravatar

# re: The Hypocrisy of Sylvester Stallone

Oh, geez.

I believe that our culture of celebrity worship has really jaded us as far as what these folks really stand for ... Does anyone take them seriously? Do we care? Do we need to care?

Do a celebrity's words or deeds further or damage our cause? Any cause?

Who are we trying to get through to by exposing Stallone's apparent hypocrisy? This is a mildly interesting tidbit of information Mr. Shark has posted, but hardly a startling revelation, even to those who actually follow celebrity news.

8/28/2007 3:05 PM | Heist
Gravatar

# re: The Hypocrisy of Sylvester Stallone

I guess my main purpose or highlighting his hypocrisy is to try to take some of the wind out of the sails of the Brady Bunch in using his "celebrity" to further their own cause. If you go right now to the bradycenter.org home page you see his mug right there front and center. Will this sway anti-gunners from contributing to this organization? Probably not, but if it causes one person to think twice about this organization's or Stallone's credibility, or if it causes Sly himself to be less willing to give aid and comfort to the enemy then I feel it was worth the effort. Also, if we do not expose and highlight the inequities in the LA County issuance of CCW permits how can we ever affect a change?
8/28/2007 3:56 PM | David
Gravatar

# re: The Hypocrisy of Sylvester Stallone

Heist I think you are missing the main point of the article. Stallone is not a hypocrite because he plays Rambo, he is a hypocrite because he owns guns while at the same time supports the Brady Center and calls for the 2nd amendment to be repealed. His acting has very little to do with it other than that is why the Brady Center wants to make him so high-profile. They love to roll out the stars for the same reason the NRA does, they get people's attention.
8/29/2007 10:48 AM | Joe
Gravatar

# re: The Hypocrisy of Sylvester Stallone

Funny how just about all of the big name anti-civil rights crowd either have CCWs, carry without one, or have hired thugs to carry for them.
8/29/2007 6:10 PM | Joseph
Gravatar

# re: The Hypocrisy of Sylvester Stallone

Well, that's a few more "actors" (should I call them actresses?) that I won't have to worry about watching on rented videos, TV shows, or new releases. I'm running out of actors/actresses that I can watch without wanting to retch. Hollywood (and much of southern Kalfornia) is a complete cancer on our country and culture. Maybe we could work out a deal with Mexico and give the southern half of the state to them, since they are becoming the de-facto owners anyway................... Let's see Rambone and Bernie Crack purchase a gun in the People's Republic of Mexico...............LOL
8/29/2007 7:57 PM | JS
Gravatar

# re: The Hypocrisy of Sylvester Stallone

good job exposing these elitists that have armed guards and special perks but don't want the rest of America to defend themselves.

Keep up the good work.
8/29/2007 9:01 PM | NL
Gravatar

# re: The Hypocrisy of Sylvester Stallone

Excellent work! Thanks for exposing yet another hypocritical public figure. While he is just an actor, he does lend his popularity (and as such, sadly, credibility) to these anti-civil rights causes.

Keep up the good work!
8/30/2007 7:28 AM | LibertyPlease
Gravatar

# re: The Hypocrisy of Sylvester Stallone

Notes on Stallone hypocrisy:

Asked his height. Answered that he's 5' 10" tall. I guess is that's wearing his high heeled shoes, that's not a lie. He appears to be about 5'7" in height at the maximum - even with the tricks that they use in films.

Asked if he had used illegal substances - answered in the negative. Was recently turned away from Australia due to possessing steroids: http://www.tmz.com/2007/03/12/stallone-charged-with-importing-steroids-down-under/ That should be grounds for revoking his license, even if it happened in another country.

But there's about as much chance of that happening as there is for Marky Mark - aka Pokey Poke - getting taken down for his handling forearms as a convicted felon.

It's interesting that in question #5 on page 3, the question reads: "Are you now, or have you been, a party to a lawsuit in the last rive (sic) years?

It's also interesting that the county redacted his reasons for requesting a CCW license.

8/30/2007 6:43 PM | Ned
Gravatar

# re: The Hypocrisy of Sylvester Stallone

Typical elitist BS; they think they are so "Above the law" and think that we, the common folk will not catch them in the act and go "gotcha, b*tch!" on them. Same goes with that fat broad named Rosie; she doesn't want people to own guns, but she has an entourage of armed bodyguards to protect her fat behind everywhere she goes.

Keep up the good work.
9/3/2007 1:59 AM | Black-Tiger
Gravatar

# re: The Hypocrisy of Sylvester Stallone

Sly is definitely NOT 5' 10". I remember walking right next to him years ago at Sherwood Exports (gun and surplus store) in the San Fernando Valley. I am 6' 2" and he was about at my nose. They took him into a back room and were sending all sort of assault rifles from the wall into the room for consideration to purchase.

He did have a really nice Black Lamborghini in the parking lot though!
9/4/2007 5:23 PM | The Master
Gravatar

# re: The Hypocrisy of Sylvester Stallone

...and what about Sheriff Baca lying about Stallone having a permit??? One would think that an important quality to being a Sheriff of a major city would be honesty? Boy, I feel real safe... "Trust me.."
10/24/2007 12:13 PM | DJ
Gravatar

# re: The Hypocrisy of Sylvester Stallone

The roids must be getting to his head
"According to Australian authorities, the 60-year-old action star, who did not appear in court, was caught at Sydney Airport with several vials of a steroid known as hGH (human growth hormone), during a random baggage check. Customs officials claim they found a total of 48 vials of the steroid after they raided Stallone's Sydney hotel room, limousine and private jet."

http://grg51.typepad.com/steroid_nation/2007/05/rocky_stallone_.html
11/4/2007 8:58 PM | Shooter
Gravatar

# re: The Hypocrisy of Sylvester Stallone

Thank you so much for the brilliant work you've done to expose Stallone's hypocrisy with regard to guns. I'm going to be linking to this page in the future and I hope it'll be around for some time to come.
11/20/2007 10:51 PM | Slidecatch
Gravatar

# re: The Hypocrisy of Sylvester Stallone

Several of my friends had sued the County of Los Angeles and were awarded CCW permits for one year. At the end of the year all the premit renewal applications were denied. Other counties will issue CCW permit and thank God I live in one that will. I would not live in LA County for all the CCW's in California. Incidentially I am finding Arizona a much more friendly 2nd amendment state and plan to move there soon. Good luck! .
11/20/2007 11:12 PM | Glock Gun Fighter
Gravatar

# re: The Hypocrisy of Sylvester Stallone

A number of years ago I heard about a talk he gave in England, and about his support of Anti Gun actions. Since that time I've not paid to watch, nor rented any movie he is involved in.

For neither man nor angel can discern
Hypocrisy-the only evil that walks invisible....
-Milton,Paradise Lost, iii:682-684
12/14/2007 6:03 PM | Gabrial
Gravatar

# re: The Hypocrisy of Sylvester Stallone

All I have to say is if us peons made the same clerical errors that he made we'd never get issued permits. It's like he was reading the form and just felt, "Nah... I don't need to follow the directions."
1/2/2008 2:10 PM | Allen
Gravatar

# re: The Hypocrisy of Sylvester Stallone

Stallone was arrested, and Steroids seized during a trip to Australia. When asked if he was addicted to or used illegal drugs, he answered no. This answer is a blatant lie. His application should be immediately and summarily revoked. I'll leave it to others to do the research on this but basically:

1 Stallone possessed and used steroids +
2. Steroids are illegal in California/He used them on a non-legitimate prescription=
3. He lied on his application
1/4/2008 7:26 PM | Andrew
Gravatar

# re: The Hypocrisy of Sylvester Stallone

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sylvester_Stallone#Growth_hormone_controversy

Enjoy.
1/4/2008 7:31 PM | Andrew
Gravatar

# re: The Hypocrisy of Sylvester Stallone

This CCW permit is now expired but I wonder if he has a new one at his new domocile in Florida? Hmmm, maybe I need to start writing some more letters...
1/4/2008 7:36 PM | David
Gravatar

# re: The Hypocrisy of Sylvester Stallone

Congrats on your fabulous work! Diane Feinstein should be next and the Stallone & Feinstein results should be sent to any and all media that hopefully will use it to further our 2nd Amendment rights! Ditto to the NRA if not already done.

Anti Terminator
1/17/2008 8:51 AM | Gil
Gravatar

# re: The Hypocrisy of Sylvester Stallone

Reading this piece so enraged me that I immediately went to my refrigerator and punched out a filet mignon that was thawing for dinner.
1/21/2008 5:59 AM | Bob Whidden
Gravatar

# re: The Hypocrisy of Sylvester Stallone

Four things....one, he does not own the house in Florida anymore, in case you care. Two, he did not renew that permit. Three, if you look specifically why he supports that particular organization what you will find is that he is an advocate of gun safety and feels it's dangerous for people to possess them who don't know how to use them, lock them up and keep them away from kids. Four, unless you know him and have had the chance to speak with him, (like any other person in Hollywood we make assumptions about from afar) it isn't fair to assume you know how he feels from some quotes taken out of context. No matter what he's done in the past, he's a devoted father, loving husband and an amazing businessman. P.S. Many doctors now use HGH for anti-aging and regulating.
1/24/2008 9:41 PM | Jen
Gravatar

# re: The Hypocrisy of Sylvester Stallone

Jen,

There is an organization that promotes and actively teaches gun safety, epecially to children, and that organization is the NRA. I suggest that if he was truly interested in gun safety that he should join and support the NRA instead. The Brady Center is an organization that promotes and actively supports efforts to ban guns and to make guns illegal for all law-abiding citizens. This is painfully obvious by just reading their press releases regarding the overturning of the DC handgun ban. The Brady Center has never met a piece of anti-gun legislation that they didn't like. If you think his blatently anti-2nd Amendment statements are "taken out of context", please provide the context that I am missing. My purpose of this blog is not to bash Sly as a father, actor, or businessman - heck, I even enjoyed his first couple Rambo and Rocky movies. But I think his support of the Brady Center and being heavily armed himself, while calling for other Americans to be disarmed is very hypocritical.
1/25/2008 7:38 AM | David
Gravatar

# re: The Hypocrisy of Sylvester Stallone

How interesting that Stallone would be issued a concealed firearm permit! It's near impossible for ordinary citizens to get a permit in California. However, if you're a celebrity or your name is Diane Feinstein, it is possible to get a permit. It's reprehensible that Stallone should get a permit yet call for the disarming of the rest of us. All these guys are hypocrites. Take Rosie O'Donnel for example. She criticized Tom Selleck for doing a ad for the NRA, yet has hired an armed bodyguard for herself. Most of the stars have bodyguards and security teams. Most ordinary Americans, who have no claim to fame, don't have the money to hire bodyguards. I guess those movie stars figure it's alright to call for a ban on gun ownership as long as they're not the one carrying the gun.

It's not only hypocrisy, it's pure elitism!
1/27/2008 1:11 PM | Thomas
Gravatar

# re: The Hypocrisy of Sylvester Stallone

Great expose, this is going to get a lot of attention now that its gone mainstream. Excellent work!
1/28/2008 1:48 PM | steve
Gravatar

# re: The Hypocrisy of Sylvester Stallone

Dianne Feinstein doesn't need a CCW permit. She has Federal credentials identifying her as a Deputy U.S. Marshall. She can carry anywhere she wants to.
1/29/2008 6:26 AM | tom
Gravatar

# re: The Hypocrisy of Sylvester Stallone

Rambo…Old Times. but yet always big fighter.
2/6/2008 6:05 AM | Gabris
Gravatar

# re: The Hypocrisy of Sylvester Stallone

It wasn't his first permit either
3/20/2008 12:16 PM | Mike
Gravatar

# re: The Hypocrisy of Sylvester Stallone

Hi, great post. Now the question is: How do we get this information out there? Im not interested in damaging Mr. Stallone's reputation personally, but people have to know how biased our CCW process is. The media outlets may be "liberal" in their bias, but that doesnt change the fact that they love a controversy. Put this out there, send the records to local and national news agencies. The people that find sites like this already know the system is broken, we need to find ways to let the average citizen know. Keep up the good work!
5/23/2008 3:01 PM | James
Gravatar

# re: The Hypocrisy of Sylvester Stallone

I wonder how happy he would be if the ATF comes to his door and confiscate his Walther ppks and his Glock 40. I bet he would just hand them over with out any probles (LOL)
6/22/2008 1:57 PM | Tim

Post Comment

Title  
Name  
Email
Url
Comment   
Please add 7 and 7 and type the answer here:

Powered by: